EVE Search - CCP - Did you miss the fanfest round table for FW?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CCP - Did you miss the fanfest round table for FW?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 11 post(s)
Ciar Meara Amarr Virtus Vindice	Posted - 2011.06.08 07:43:00 - [1] Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Brooks Puuntai Hell even make it slowly rise in sec status and allow it to shift into highsec. That way the FW pilots could then continue to fight for the system w/o interference from pirates/others. If FW allowed true change in sovereignty along a sec status scale, then it would be truly interesting. Eg: A system starts out as a Gallente 0.8. Successive Caldari victories could lower the sec to 0.5. At this point there would be some kind of "milestone event"[...] The whole process would take weeks, but it would give the FW teams a genuine reason to fight, it would make FW relevant to the rest of the game, and it would allow the players to redesign the map (albeit extremely gradually). Originally by: Har Harrison Originally by: Moolti Speaking for myself and not The Electus Matari: I would love to do more for FW. Right now we have to have individual corps drop alliance to join FW. I would love for Alliances to have a better way of joining FW. I tried FW for a while, but while in FW it's all I could do. There was very little way to do anything else. In order to do other stuff, I had to leave FW. Once I left FW, it was easy to stay out of it, and hard to "go do FW for a little bit". It seems to me that the treaty mechanic that has been proposed in the past by CCP would be an excellent way of allowing FW and RP allainces to interact. [...] This could allow CVA or UK for example to have a larger involvement with the militia without the issues of gcc. Originally by: Othran I have an alt in FW - just to bump standings really. Don't really see anyone looking for fights. This is DT +/- 3 hours, which I appreciate is quiet but its the same time period I played in a couple of years ago. Its just wall to wall mission runners now. To be brutally frank I see more FW people fighting in npc null than I do in Heim/Met/Devoid/Bleak Lands. Originally by: Veshta Yoshida FW is currently the best place outside of null to pew and get easy ISK, the amount of failscade/disillusioned null corps that come through our doors is staggering. Not only do they get wallets fattened up but they get to practice/indulge in small scale warfare and pick up competent pilots before heading back out. Originally by: Ruah Piskonit ... Well said Admiral. The RP potential is immense, almost all currently active RP elements in Eve have dabbled in or are keeping tabs/assisting FW in one way or another. Originally by: Har Harrison Team BFF definately can fix a number of the bugs one would hope... Not sure there is really that much they can do actually. Most of FW is a mash-up of code from elsewhere (exploration, missions etc.) so they would have to track effects of changes across all the related code .. Note that practically all the heinous bugs (cloaking capture, auto-run timers etc) we have suffered from over the years were a direct result of a change somewhere else that wrecking on the mash-up .. Originally by: Lord Meriak What alot of fw would like to see is : Unable to cloak up inside a mission. System to mean something, Get rid of the bunker and have Conquerable Station's, When the station is taken the agent is then offline.Making some systems key systems because of the agent inside. The station should only let that faction dock. We also like If a member of the miltia member is attacked they get small standing hit to that faction.All fw member taking hits to the factions we attack but neutral can hunt fw then go and park in ie: jita / amarr, making neutral rp allince's and not just say we pick a side. This would be hard on the codes writer's but when this game started everyone said it could not be done the game was a trailer & not game play, we want that ccp back. All quoted for great truth and justice. While not all these suggestiosn are wise or even easily implemented they do show a way forward. So perhaps the CCP team BFF should do less "scrumming" and "thinking on FW" and more implementing of ideas.Because let's be honest, These guys above me know what they are talking about and most CCP devs these days do not when it concerns FW. I play FW to since I left CVA but the lack of fight and purpose has left me with very little joy so far. And I am a Roleplayer since the start of EVE (Day 4 I think). ------------------------------------------------- A friend of death, a brother of luck and a son of a *****
Ciar Meara Amarr Virtus Vindice	Posted - 2011.06.21 11:59:00 - [2] Originally by: Har Harrison I just read through the Incarna 1.0 patch notes. Well the good news is that CCP have made some improvements to FW. The bad news is that the below list appears to be all that has been done Factional Warfare NPCs now care about defending against their allies enemies While this change is good, how about fixing the plex spawning issue so that the NPCs are there to care about defending against their allies enemies??? At least it something they could do quickly without to much hassle and did. Perhaps we'll see more after the patching week and now that there are no more Denial of service attacks? ------------------------------------------------- A friend of death, a brother of luck and a son of a *****
Ciar Meara Amarr Virtus Vindice	Posted - 2011.06.30 08:15:00 - [3] well seeing the CSM is meeting atm, we'll just bump this in case they are reading the forums while listening to CCP's bull**. - Hilmar getur ekki tala= vi= ¦ig n·na, hann er a= fara ß japanska Tfskuverslun.**
Ciar Meara Amarr Virtus Vindice	Posted - 2011.06.30 08:40:00 - [4] About as possible as CCP giving a marvelous clear and meaningfull presentation to the CSM. I think the CSM might adress this point if they find the time since it was mentioned by many players as a big feature that has no action on it for years. - Hilmar getur ekki tala= vi= ¦ig n·na, hann er a= fara ß japanska Tfskuverslun.
Ciar Meara Amarr Virtus Vindice	Posted - 2011.07.08 12:41:00 - [5] Edited by: Ciar Meara on 08/07/2011 12:42:13 Originally by: Rodj Blake Unfortunately CCP's trailers ceased to have anything to do with actual in-game stuff a while back. The new trailer has some good moments though Rodj, I remember battles like that in PIE and not so long ago in Providence (well long enough ago). Although obviously Amarr always win... Anyway, yeah Faction Warfare...
Ciar Meara Amarr Virtus Vindice	Posted - 2011.07.18 07:22:00 - [6] Edited by: Ciar Meara on 18/07/2011 07:22:03 I'v been watching and posting in this thread but neither this one or the "ask a dev" has received the attention it deserves so it should get noticed some more I think. - Hilmar getur ekki tala= vi= ¦ig n·na, hann er a= fara ß japanska Tfskuverslun.
Ciar Meara Amarr Virtus Vindice	Posted - 2011.07.28 09:53:00 - [7] So whatcha think guys, should we just give up on this? Perhaps it's best to give up now before CCP actually gives us hope... - Hilmar getur ekki tala= vi= ¦ig n·na, hann er a= fara ß japanska Tfskuverslun.
Ciar Meara Amarr Virtus Vindice	Posted - 2011.08.29 14:30:00 - [8] Originally by: Cearain In his latest interview CCP soundwave was hardly trying to hand out false promises regarding eve. However, he did say that FW was a high priority. I think that is good news. It such a high priority that: - The new winter expansion is going to be (another) interation on 0.0 - This thread after a short attention of the devs (we will get back to you) was ignored - No Questions regarding FW on any substance have been answered in the now dead "ask a dev thread" - Not one dev commented on FW besides "its important" for months (years?) now - Hilmar getur ekki tala= vi= ¦ig n·na, hann er a= fara f japanska tfskuverslun.
Ciar Meara Amarr Virtus Vindice	Posted - 2011.08.31 12:21:00 - [9] Edited by: Ciar Meara on 31/08/2011 13:15:00 Originally by: Rodj Blake So why raise hopes by scheduling a round-table? And do you really think that they will be starting work on fixing FW in January? I don't think that's fair Rodj, they didn't even show up at the round table so you have to admit they made it really clear that they didn't care about it (FW). January is reserved for blasters I hear, so it will be february (2015). - Hilmar getur ekki tala= vi= ¦ig n·na, hann er a= fara f japanska tfskuverslun.
Ciar Meara Amarr Virtus Vindice	Posted - 2011.09.04 21:16:00 - [10] Originally by: Nin Kimrov I agree, this need to be first, for memory. /nods I agree with the above statements and/or products. - English only please. Zymurgist

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.